🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include events where African descendants are paid to talk to white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. Denise Miller, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.